The uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party has intensified its legal battle over South Africa’s national and provincial election results, calling on the Electoral Court to permit oral evidence in their application to have the election results set aside. This move marks a critical escalation in the party’s quest to challenge what they allege are significant irregularities that occurred during the electoral process.
According to the MK party, the disputed election results were manipulated during a critical period when the Electoral Commission of South Africa’s (IEC) leaderboard system went offline for several hours. The party argues that during this downtime, vote tallies were altered in a way that directly impacted their ability to secure a two-thirds majority. This claim is at the core of their push for a rerun of the 29 May elections, which they contend failed to reflect the true will of the people.
In court documents submitted to support their case, the MK party cited discrepancies between the voting results and the voter rolls in several districts. These alleged irregularities, they claim, are sufficient grounds to question the credibility of the IEC’s vote-capturing and reporting systems. The party has emphasized that allowing oral evidence will provide an opportunity to clarify critical technical issues and enable cross-examination of the experts involved, which they believe will further bolster their case.
Barnabas Xulu, the MK party’s legal representative, stressed the importance of presenting oral testimony to the court. In his formal request, Xulu wrote that discrepancies in the voting process and the reliability of the IEC’s systems could best be resolved through in-person questioning of expert witnesses. He argued that this approach would allow the court to gain a deeper understanding of the complex issues at hand while ensuring transparency and fairness.
The MK party’s case hinges on a report submitted by its technical expert, Vusi Mhlongo, who alleges systemic flaws in the IEC’s electoral processes. Mhlongo’s findings, which claim to provide evidence of manipulation, have come under scrutiny by the IEC, which has questioned both his expertise and the validity of his report. This has led to a heated exchange between the parties, with the MK party maintaining that their evidence is sound and that Mhlongo’s testimony is essential to proving their claims.
In addition to their call for oral evidence, the MK party has also requested that the court compel the IEC to provide all documents related to the disputed election. These documents, the party argues, are critical for a comprehensive review of the electoral process and would help uncover the extent of the alleged irregularities.
This case is not the first time the MK party has sought to challenge the results of the 29 May elections. An earlier attempt to nullify the results was withdrawn without proper authorization, leading to the IEC seeking punitive costs against the party. In their renewed application, the MK party has submitted what they claim is irrefutable evidence, including Mhlongo’s report, to demonstrate that they secured a larger share of the vote than the 14.5% initially reported.
The Electoral Court has acknowledged receipt of the MK party’s request for oral evidence and has stated that it will consider the application. This case follows a similar attempt by the African Transformation Movement, which also sought to nullify the election results. However, their application was dismissed last week after the court ruled that they had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.
The outcome of the MK party’s application could have far-reaching implications for South Africa’s electoral system. If the court rules in favor of allowing oral evidence, it could set a precedent for greater transparency and scrutiny in future elections. Such a decision could also pave the way for similar challenges in other countries, highlighting the global importance of ensuring electoral integrity.
This developing story underscores the critical need for accountability and transparency in democratic processes. As the world watches, the MK party’s legal battle has the potential to shape the future of elections in South Africa and beyond.
Stay ahead of this and other significant news stories by subscribing to Innovation Times, your go-to platform for in-depth coverage of global innovation, technology, leadership, and entrepreneurship. Be informed and inspired—sign up today to get the latest news and insights delivered straight to your inbox.
