US President Donald Trump is pushing to secure $500 billion worth of Ukraine’s rare earth and critical minerals as part of a broader strategy to strengthen America’s industrial sector and reduce reliance on China. This initiative is also tied to negotiations for a peace deal with Ukraine, serving as a potential compensation for the US military aid provided during the war. The deal, if successful, could significantly shift global trade dynamics, helping Washington break free from China’s dominance in the rare earth supply chain. However, the challenges surrounding this move are immense, ranging from geopolitical instability to long-term supply chain constraints that could take years to overcome.
Since returning to office, Trump has intensified his long-standing economic war against China by doubling down on import levies and trade restrictions. He has imposed a 20 percent tariff on Chinese goods while proceeding with a 25 percent duty on two of the United States’ largest trading partners. Despite these efforts, the US remains heavily dependent on China for critical minerals, which are essential for high-tech manufacturing, defense systems, aerospace technology, and electric vehicle production. China currently controls over half of the world’s critical mineral production and processes approximately 90 percent of rare earth elements, making it difficult for Washington to find alternative suppliers. From 2020 to 2023, reports indicate that the US imported around 70 percent of its rare earth metals from China, further emphasizing the challenge of achieving complete independence from Beijing’s supply chains.
In December 2024, China escalated trade tensions by banning the export of several critical minerals to the US, including gallium, germanium, antimony, and superhard materials. This move was in direct response to Washington’s new restrictions on chip exports to China, highlighting the deepening economic rift between the two superpowers. Gallium plays a crucial role in defense technology, while graphite is a key component in electric vehicles and nuclear reactors. These restrictions have placed additional pressure on the US to secure alternative sources, making Ukraine an attractive option for Trump’s administration.
Ukraine is estimated to hold around 5 percent of the world’s critical raw materials, including a third of Europe’s lithium deposits and 7 percent of its titanium reserves. The country also possesses significant amounts of copper, zinc, silver, nickel, and cobalt, all of which are essential for various high-tech industries. However, since the war began in 2022, Russia has seized control of several key mining sites in Ukraine, raising concerns about how much of these resources remain accessible. Even if the US successfully secures a supply agreement with Ukraine, the long-term viability of the plan is uncertain due to a lack of investment in the country’s mining sector and insufficient refining capabilities. Unlike China, which has spent decades building a dominant supply chain for rare earth elements, Ukraine lacks the infrastructure to process and refine these materials on a large scale.
Industry experts have also raised doubts about the actual value of Ukraine’s mineral reserves. Argus Media, an independent energy and commodity research firm, estimates that global rare earth deposits are valued between $4 billion and $12.5 billion. This makes the $500 billion valuation of Ukraine’s mineral wealth highly questionable. If the US is relying on Ukraine to significantly reduce its dependence on China, the numbers may not add up. The logistical challenges of extracting, processing, and transporting these minerals also pose major obstacles, particularly as Ukraine’s mining sector remains underdeveloped.
Another major concern is the geopolitical risk associated with the deal. With the US recently pausing military aid to Ukraine following a heated exchange between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, negotiations have reached a stalemate. The peace talks are critical to finalizing any agreement on rare earth minerals, but the breakdown in discussions has cast doubt on whether the deal will materialize anytime soon. Additionally, if Trump moves forward with aggressive tariffs against China while attempting to secure Ukraine’s mineral supply, it could escalate tensions further, prompting Beijing to retaliate with additional trade restrictions.
Despite these challenges, Trump remains determined to reshape the global economic landscape by reducing the United States’ dependence on China. If his administration successfully gains access to Ukraine’s mineral wealth, it could provide a foundation for building an independent supply chain. However, experts warn that even with a strong supply deal in place, the transition away from China will not happen overnight. The US currently lacks the infrastructure needed to process these minerals at the scale required for its industries. Developing new refining facilities and establishing a self-sufficient supply network could take years or even decades.
While Trump’s plan represents an ambitious effort to counter China’s dominance in the rare earth market, the road ahead is filled with uncertainties. The outcome of this strategy will depend on how the US navigates diplomatic tensions, investment challenges, and supply chain constraints. If the administration fails to secure a reliable alternative, the country’s reliance on Chinese minerals could persist, making it difficult for Washington to gain true economic independence from Beijing.
Stay ahead with the latest news on global innovation, leadership, entrepreneurship, business, and tech. Join us on WhatsApp or Telegram for real-time updates. Have a report or article? Send it to report@theinnovationtimes.com. Follow us on X Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, Pinterest, and Facebook for more insights and trends.
