In a bold and sweeping move that is bound to have significant implications for global diplomacy and international relations, President Donald Trump has signed an executive order pulling the United States out of key United Nations (UN) bodies. The withdrawal includes the US exit from the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), along with a broader review of US funding for the United Nations. These actions reflect the president’s longstanding criticisms of the UN, which he has often accused of being biased against the United States and failing to deliver on its global mission.
Trump’s executive order, signed on Tuesday, marks a significant shift in U.S. foreign policy. This is not the first time Trump has taken such action. During his first term, he withdrew the U.S. from the UNHRC in 2018, citing the council’s perceived bias against Israel and its membership of countries with questionable human rights records. In 2021, President Joe Biden reinstated U.S. membership in the UNHRC, but Trump’s latest order marks a sharp reversal of that decision, underscoring his administration’s ongoing commitment to challenge what it perceives as systemic issues within the UN system.
In addition to the withdrawal from the UNHRC and UNRWA, Trump’s order mandates a thorough review of the U.S.’s participation in the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The administration’s concerns about the inefficiency and alleged anti-American bias within these bodies have been central to the motivation behind the executive order.
Trump’s Critique of the UN System
The president has been an outspoken critic of the United Nations for years, regularly highlighting what he perceives as its inefficiency and lack of accountability. Speaking to reporters, Trump emphasized that while the UN has “tremendous potential,” it is “not being well run.” He described the organization as “disproportionate,” especially in its funding model, which places a heavy burden on the United States, the largest single contributor to the UN system.
The U.S. has long been the largest financial backer of the United Nations, a position that Trump argues is not equitable given the contributions of other member states. “It should be funded by everybody,” he said, stressing that the United States should not be carrying the financial weight alone. Trump has repeatedly called for other nations to increase their financial support for multilateral institutions, including NATO, where the U.S. also bears a disproportionate share of the costs.
Trump’s administration is clearly positioning itself as a force for reform within international organizations, pushing for changes that would reduce America’s financial obligations while ensuring that the UN performs its core functions more effectively. According to White House staff secretary Will Scharf, the review of U.S. funding and participation in the UN is driven by concerns over “wild disparities and levels of funding among different countries,” as well as an ongoing frustration with the UN’s handling of global crises and conflicts.
Global Reactions and UN’s Response
While President Trump’s decision is likely to stir controversy both in the U.S. and abroad, the UN has responded with measured remarks. UN Secretary-General António Guterres, whose tenure has been focused on reforming the organization to increase efficiency and innovation, expressed hope for continued collaboration. “US support for the United Nations has saved countless lives and advanced global security,” Guterres’ spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said in response to Trump’s order. “The Secretary-General looks forward to continuing his productive relationship with President Trump and the US Government to strengthen that relationship in today’s turbulent world.”
However, the US withdrawal from these key UN agencies is a clear signal of Trump’s dissatisfaction with the current state of global governance. His administration has frequently argued that the UN is not meeting its intended purpose—particularly in conflict resolution and peacekeeping efforts—and that a major overhaul is needed to ensure that international bodies like the UN are better equipped to address the world’s most pressing issues.
The Path Forward: Is Reform on the Horizon?
Trump’s bold action on the UN is unlikely to be the final word on America’s role in international diplomacy. The review of U.S. funding and participation could lead to further shifts in America’s approach to multilateral cooperation. Trump’s vision of reforming the UN and demanding more equitable contributions from other countries could reshape global institutions in the years to come.
For now, it remains to be seen whether this executive order will have a lasting impact on the future of U.S.-UN relations. The president’s stance on international organizations has always been contentious, and this latest development will only intensify the debate over the effectiveness and legitimacy of the United Nations in fulfilling its mission.
Stay Ahead with the Latest News
The global impact of this decision is profound, and as the situation unfolds, it will undoubtedly continue to shape international relations and U.S. foreign policy. To stay informed and get real-time updates on this developing story, join our community on WhatsApp or Telegram. For more in-depth analyses and expert perspectives on global politics, leadership, and innovation, sign up to receive exclusive reports.
Got a report or article you’d like to share? Send it to report@theinnovationtimes.com. Follow us on X (Twitter), Instagram, LinkedIn, YouTube, Pinterest, and Facebook for more insights on the latest global trends, technology, and international affairs.
